Is it possible to assert the existence of a timeless material in architecture from an aesthetic standpoint? Undoubtedly, wood and concrete emerge as strong contenders, not only due to their representation of the solidity, volume, and mass of buildings but also because they provide a broad range of aesthetic possibilities in projects. Concrete, in particular, exhibits greater malleability in comparison to wood. While wood already offers flexible solutions, such as through CLT systems, concrete is derived from a blend of liquid, powder, and an aggregate—a paste that can be poured into a mold, spread over a surface and shaped into various forms.
The texture of the material, coupled with its grayish color, produces a visual effect of sobriety, emphasizing the contemporary trend toward brutalist aesthetics. In today's architecture, exposed concrete surfaces within homes serve as a subtle yet elegant component, contributing to a neutral "foundation" upon which layers of more pronounced elements are constructed. These may include furniture with bold shapes or colors, objects, and textiles that either complement or contrast with the inherent rigidity of the base.
